ITF

Facilities Guide

Issue link: http://itf.uberflip.com/i/1255985

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 58 of 61

59 FACILITIES GUIDE | JUNE 2020 LIGHT SOURCES Many types and lamps available today can be used for the lighting tennis courts. The most appropriate lamps in common usage are described below, including the range of lamp types and wattages and efficacies. Efficacy describes the ratio between the light output (lumens) and power input (watts). Lamp type Range of suitable wattages Efficacy lm/W Advantages Disadvantages Metal halide 400 to 2000 60 - 100 White light with good colour rendering High efficiency Low running costs Relatively long lifetime High replacement cost Length of time to reach full strength (10-15 minutes) High-pressure sodium 250 to1000 90-130 Very high efficiency Low running cost Long lifetime Poor colour rendering Length of time to reach full strength (10-15 minutes) Fluorescent 55-60 60 - 100 Good colour rendering and low glare High efficiency Suitable for use with time clocks Inefficient at low temperatures Require deflectors to enable light to diffuse in correct direction Noisy, therefore distracting to players Low lumen package Tungstenhalogen 500-2000 20-25 Good colour rendering Low initial cost Suitable for use with time clocks Relatively small fixtures Short lifetime Low efficiency High maintenance and operating costs Table 8. Summary of lamps in common usage.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of ITF - Facilities Guide